What's Your Procedure? |
|
Councillor André Laframboise told the Ottawa Citizen that many of Aylmer’s 42,000 residents drank inadequately purified water because Gatineau failed to properly notify them that they had to boil city drinking water. From the article: “The city notified people about the need to boil water through a press release and if you didn’t happen to be in the right place at the right time to hear the news or read the paper, you wouldn’t know about the warning,” Laframboise said. He said the city’s telephone warning system that automatically calls residents when they need to boil possibly contaminated water failed because many people were not at home, do not have telephone answering machines and did not hear the warning. “We have an automated telephone system that called about 1,000 households but not the whole sector.” The Aylmer advisory was lifted on July 17. While no related injuries or illnesses have been reported, it sounds like the City of Gatineau needs to sit down and rethink its notification strategy. Laframboise suggested that city employees should have distributed printed boil water warnings by hand to households in order to ensure the affected homes and businesses were made aware of the problem. Of course, hindsight is 20/20. Some municipalities, however, have taken a strong preventative role in developing their notification procedures. For example, the Town of Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia has a fairly straightforward communication plan with a simple goal: effectively communicate the issue. It’s available on the Town’s website. It reads:
Do you know your municipality’s notification protocol? If the idea of drinking water that hasn’t been properly treated makes you uneasy, familiarize yourself with the City’s official website or call your public works department. Does the communication plan give you confidence? **Update** One of our Twitter followers commented that there’s no social media noted in Port Hawkesbury’s plan, and that doesn’t inspire his confidence—it’s “very last century,” he said. As an avid social media participant, I agree, but it’s interesting and important to note that many municipalities—large and small—are thinking in this direction. They have Facebook and Twitter accounts, oftentimes linked to their news release feeds. For them, it’s just a matter of indicating this coverage in their official plans. Does your municipality participate in social media? |











Rather than trying to take remedial action AFTER a contamination isn’t it smarter to have protection against a Boil Water Advisory happening in the first place?
We provide a water security, purity and environmentally sustainable program that installs at the point of entry to a building.
Every single owner and every single tap remain safe with our program.
We do not need electricity or chemicals to provide full time protection against these health warnings.
Better still, we never use RO systems and ours is certified to provide 99.999% microbiologically pure water 24/7 regardless of what happens to the plant, underground or inline.
For something that can affect peoples health water security is the way to go.
Why do people wait until something bad happens?
There’s a solution available right now that saves them money and improves their health and security of their water.
People shouldn’t have to suffer when the solution is so simple.
In theory, yes — prevention is best. But, in the event of an equipment failure, such as the one at the filtration plant on the Ottawa River, it’s important to have advisory strategies in place. While we do have great solutions available, no technology can provide a 100 per cent guarantee.
There are also many small communities under boil water advisories that do not have the building infrastructure suitable for point of entry security.